Pension Mis-Selling Claim
FCA ENFORCEMENT

Vintage Investment Services — Pension Claim

Vintage Investment Services was the subject of FCA enforcement action following a 97% DB pension transfer rate in 2016–17 — a statistic the FCA described as highly anomalous and indicative of systemic unsuitable advice. Directors were subsequently banned. If you were advised by Vintage, FSCS and FOS routes may be available.

Start your free assessment →

What Happened

Vintage Investment Services was a regulated financial adviser that came to FCA attention following an extraordinary 97% defined benefit pension transfer recommendation rate during 2016–17. In a market where the FCA expects the vast majority of DB transfers to be unsuitable for clients, a 97% transfer rate is statistically impossible to justify on suitability grounds and indicates systemic advice failure.

The FCA took enforcement action against Vintage and its directors were subsequently banned from working in financial services. This enforcement history is directly relevant to any suitability complaint against Vintage — FCA enforcement findings provide strong corroborating evidence that the advice model was systematically flawed.

Which Claim Routes Apply

Route 3

FSCS Compensation

Following FCA enforcement action and the directors' banning, the FSCS may provide a compensation route if Vintage is in default. Check the FSCS failed firms register for current status.

Up to £85,000
Route 2

FOS Complaint

Where Vintage is still within FOS jurisdiction, an individual complaint on suitability grounds remains available. FCA enforcement findings will support the complaint.

Up to £455,000
⚠ Time Limit Warning — Act Now

Vintage's advice was given primarily in 2016–17. The six-year FOS absolute clock on this advice has now expired for many claimants. However, the three-year awareness clock runs from when you first discovered the extent of your loss — and FSCS routes may have different limitation rules. An urgent assessment is essential. See redressadvisory.com/time-limits for the full limitation framework.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does a 97% transfer rate mean for my claim?

A 97% DB transfer recommendation rate is statistically incompatible with genuine individual suitability assessment. The FCA itself states that for most consumers, transferring out of a DB pension is unlikely to be in their best interests. A rate of 97% indicates that Vintage was recommending transfers as a matter of course, not based on individual client circumstances — which is the definition of unsuitable advice.

Vintage directors were banned — is the firm still operating?

Following FCA enforcement action, Vintage is likely no longer operating. Check the FCA register for current status. If Vintage has failed, FSCS compensation routes apply.

Start your free assessment →

No obligation · No upfront cost · We will never cold-call you

Redress Advisory Ltd is a technology platform. Regulated claims work carried out by our SRA-authorised Operating Partner solicitor firms. You may complain directly to the FOS (0800 023 4567) or FSCS (0800 678 1100) free of charge. Legal references: Berkeley Burke v FOS [2018] EWHC 2878 · Adams v Options UK [2021] EWCA Civ 1188 · Fletcher v Options UK [2024] EWCA Civ 541.