SIPP Operator · Merged with Curtis Banks

Talbot and Muir — SIPP Mis-selling Claims

Talbot and Muir was a specialist SIPP operator that merged with Curtis Banks, one of the UK's largest independent SIPP providers. If you held a Talbot and Muir SIPP containing non-standard or illiquid investments and suffered losses, you may have a claim against the adviser or the operator — now pursued through Curtis Banks as successor.

Curtis Banks Successor following merger
Route 1 Complaint to Curtis Banks
Route 2 FOS escalation
Route 4 Civil litigation — uncapped
Merged — Part of Curtis Banks

Talbot and Muir — Background and Merger

Talbot and Muir was a well-established SIPP and SSAS specialist that provided bespoke pension arrangements to clients across the UK. Following its merger with Curtis Banks Group PLC, existing Talbot and Muir client accounts are now administered by Curtis Banks as the combined group entity.

Some Talbot and Muir SIPPs were used to hold non-standard, illiquid, or high-risk investments recommended by IFA firms. The SIPP operator liability framework established by the courts — requiring operators to conduct adequate due diligence on investments admitted to their products — applies equally to Talbot and Muir's historical conduct.

As the legal successor to Talbot and Muir, Curtis Banks is the correct respondent for DISP complaints and FOS referrals relating to historical Talbot and Muir conduct. Redress Advisory can help you navigate the claim structure and identify the appropriate route.

Claims Routes

How to Pursue Your Claim

The correct route depends on whether the firm is still active, the nature of your loss, and whether FSCS compensation has already been paid on related adviser claims.

Route 1

Complaint to Curtis Banks

Curtis Banks, as the successor entity to Talbot and Muir, is the correct respondent for historical DISP complaints about Talbot and Muir's conduct as SIPP operator. Submit your complaint in writing with full supporting documentation.

Curtis Banks as successor
Route 2

Financial Ombudsman Service

If Curtis Banks rejects your complaint, escalate to FOS within six months of the Final Response Letter. FOS can adjudicate on historical operator conduct post-merger.

FOS escalation
Route 3

FSCS (Failed Adviser)

If the IFA who recommended your Talbot and Muir SIPP has subsequently failed and been declared in default, a separate FSCS claim against that adviser up to £85,000 is available.

Against failed adviser
Route 4

Civil Litigation

For substantial losses where the FOS cap is insufficient, civil litigation against Curtis Banks (as successor) and other solvent parties can pursue uncapped recovery.

Uncapped recovery
Key Case Law

Legal Framework for SIPP Operator Liability

Questions & Answers

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Curtis Banks inherit Talbot and Muir's liabilities?
As the corporate successor following the merger, Curtis Banks generally assumes liability for Talbot and Muir's historical conduct. DISP complaints and FOS referrals relating to historical Talbot and Muir matters should be directed to Curtis Banks.
I had a bespoke or non-standard asset in my Talbot and Muir SIPP. Is that relevant?
Yes. The claim turns on whether the non-standard asset was suitable for you given your circumstances, and whether Talbot and Muir carried out adequate due diligence before admitting it to your SIPP. Both are live regulatory questions.
Urgent Notice

Time Limits on SIPP Claims

SIPP operator claims are subject to the same DISP and Limitation Act deadlines as adviser claims. FSCS claims must also meet prescribed eligibility windows.

⚠ Do Not Delay

DISP: six years from advice or three years from discovery. See redressadvisory.com/time-limits.

View the full time limits guidance →

Start Your Claim Assessment

Redress Advisory assesses your position across all four routes and connects you with an SRA-regulated solicitor at no upfront cost.

Begin Your Assessment

Regulatory Notice & FCA Self-Service Disclaimer

You do not need to use a claims management company to pursue a pension mis-selling complaint. You can complain directly to the financial firm, escalate to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), apply to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), or instruct a solicitor independently — all free of charge. Using Redress Advisory does not improve the likelihood of success compared to pursuing a claim yourself, and our fee will reduce any compensation you receive.

Redress Advisory Ltd (Company No. 17295681) is a claims management company. Regulated legal work is carried out by our Operating SRA Partner solicitor firms. We are not a firm of solicitors and we do not provide legal advice.

The information on this page is for general informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, legal, or claims management advice. Individual outcomes depend on the specific facts of each case. Historical outcomes in related cases are not a guarantee of results in your case.

FOS: 0800 023 4567  |  FSCS: 0800 678 1100  |  FCA Register: register.fca.org.uk