Pension Mis-Selling Claim
ACTIVE — FOS ROUTE

Curtis Banks — Pension Claim

Curtis Banks is one of the UK's largest SIPP providers. If you were transferred into a Curtis Banks SIPP on unsuitable advice, FOS routes are available.

Start your free assessment →

What Happened

Curtis Banks Group plc is one of the UK’s largest independent SIPP providers, administering over 75,000 SIPPs. The firm has faced complaint activity relating to administration delays, fee transparency, and the suitability of investments held within Curtis Banks SIPPs on the advice of third-party IFAs.

Curtis Banks bears its own regulatory obligations as SIPP operator under Berkeley Burke [2018] — independently of whatever advice you received from your IFA. Where Curtis Banks accepted non-standard investments without adequate due diligence, it may bear separate liability from any adviser suitability complaint.

Which Claim Routes Apply

Route 1

Direct Complaint

A formal DISP complaint to Curtis Banks is the required first step.

No cap
Route 2

FOS Escalation

The FOS has jurisdiction over complaints about Curtis Banks administration and operator due diligence.

Up to £455,000
⚠ Time Limit Warning — Act Now

The six-year FOS clock runs from the date of advice or transfer. Obtain a formal assessment to confirm your position. See redressadvisory.com/time-limits for the full limitation framework.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I claim against Curtis Banks even if my IFA gave the advice?

Yes. Curtis Banks as SIPP operator has its own separate obligations under FCA Principles 2, 3, and 6. A complaint against Curtis Banks for its operator failures runs separately from any adviser complaint.

Start your free assessment →

No obligation · No upfront cost · We will never cold-call you

Redress Advisory Ltd is a technology platform. Regulated claims work carried out by our SRA-authorised Operating Partner solicitor firms. You may complain directly to the FOS (0800 023 4567) or FSCS (0800 678 1100) free of charge. Legal references: Berkeley Burke v FOS [2018] EWHC 2878 · Adams v Options UK [2021] EWCA Civ 1188 · Fletcher v Options UK [2024] EWCA Civ 541.